Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) have turned been progressively pervasive ever since the middle of the 1990s as a successful instrument to develop exchange. In 2016 studies show that the total number of physical Free trade agreements in constrain was more than 200. International trade plays a very vital role in the state basically because not any other state has everything that it’s people need and want. There would be a lesser need for trade if every country in the whole world had enough or more than enough resources to meets its people’s need and wants. Trade affects the world economy. It allows the countries to get some things that we can’t produce. In addition, international trade can also affect the life of the individual because it has an important aspect in living up to one’s standards and providing employment.
Trade impacts of a FTA have widely been known and accepted amongst students to include static and dynamic results. Analysis of static impacts is frequently based totally in the concept of customs union and is influenced by way of Viner (1950), who furnished a conceptual framework for reading the change results of a FTA. Besides the static outcomes according to Viner, FTAs also result to dynamic effects that take a lot longer time to be apparent to the economy but has a tendency to continue on providing benefits even after the withdraw of a country from a Free Trade Agreement. It promotes cooperation within the country and within the areas of creating jobs and sustainable development. Helping in a way of creating opportunities for nations especially for developing countries, in harmonizing trade policies and reforming them. But in the other side of the book, joining the Free Trade Agreement there must some challenges that you should take into consideration. First, from a social welfare perspective a Free Trade Agreement is not considered as the first best choice due to it’s nature of discrimination and other countries that are not involved or included in the Free Trade Agreement. Second, it causes a diversion of trade thus it can reduce welfare which is absolutely not good for the country’s economic stability. Lastly, since participation is now more visible in the country then this can lead to a Spaghetti Bowl Effect, where the increasing number of Free Trade Agreements between countries slows down trade relations between them. It is therefore important that in order to have a more effective FTA to involve all parties that will be impacted by the said agreement before it comes into action.
Many countries have agreed to include themselves to Free Trade Agreements with its continuous expansion in both Asia and some parts of the Pacific Region. The Republic of Korea, for example, has over 27 FTAs within or outside the region. The Vietnam-Korea Free trade agreement is also one example of countries that co-depend on each other. This Vietnam-Korea free trade agreement (VKFTA) was signed on the 20th of December 2015 and they aim to increase their bilateral trade between both the countries to US$70 billion by the year 2020 and also to attract Korean investors on their management expertise and technology. This VKFTA promotes opportunities on investment and trade & economic growth for both countries. Joining this Free Trade Agreement has helped Vietnam improve the country’s trade efficiency since according to the Foreign Investment Agency under the Ministry of Planning and Investment, South Korea is Vietnam’s largest investor with over $35 billion in more than 4,200 projects and also one of Vietnam’s main export partners with 5.3% of $6.4 million of exports in the first few months of 2015. Under the VKFTA, both of the country’s companies will benefit from reduced taxes which means that it will the improve the economy by increasing sales (more buyers will be enticed to spend their money)